Photoprotection habits, attitudes and knowledge among school communities in the Costa del sol (Spain).

BACKGROUND: Scholar photoprotection campaigns are among the most effective strategies for preventing skin cancer. Analysis of the target population constitutes a valuable starting point for the implementation of primary prevention strategies. Our aim is to study photoprotection habits, attitudes and knowledge among a Spanish school community. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study targeting schoolchildren, parents and teachers at 20 schools in the area of the Costa del Sol Health Agency in southern Spain. Two population-specific, validated questionnaires were used: the CHRESI (for children aged 0-10 years) and CHACES Questionnaire(for adults and adolescents aged > 11 years). We collected demographic data, skin colour, skin phototype, sunburn episodes, sun exposure and photoprotection practices, attitudes and knowledge. RESULTS: 1728 questionnaires were analyzed (22% parents, 14.5% teachers, 44.8% adolescents and 18.6% children). The average ages were 8 years (children), 16 years (adolescents), 39 years (teachers) and 42 years (parents). Globally, the predominant features were: male sex (52%), Spanish nationality (92%) and phototypes II-III (61%). Children, followed by adolescents, reported the highest exposure to the sun, both in frequency and in duration. Adolescents had the higher rate of sunburn (75%), followed by parents/teachers (54.1%) and children (44.1%). Children and their parents were the most likely to adopt photoprotection measures, while adolescents presented more risky attitudes. Knowledge regarding photoprotection was acceptable (6.9/10). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need to improve photoprotection knowledge, habits and attitudes among our target population. Scholars, parents and teachers in our area should be addressed in campaigns to promote healthy sun exposure habits, thus reducing skin cancer-related morbidity and mortality in this region.

Validation of a Questionnaire Designed to Study Knowledge, Attitudes, and Habits Related to Sun Exposure Among Young Adults: The CHACES Questionnaire. / Validación de un cuestionario para el estudio sobre hábitos, actitudes y conocimientos en fotoprotección en la población adultojuvenil: «cuestionario CHACES¼.

Skin cancer prevention campaigns in schools have been shown to be both effective and cost-effective. The success of such programs depends on the use of an appropriate design informed by a prior survey of the target population (pupils, teachers, and parents). There are, however, very few validated Spanish-language questionnaires designed to study the habits and knowledge of this population with respect to sun exposure in childhood and none designed for use with a young adult population. OBJECTIVES: To construct and validate a questionnaire designed to explore sun exposure behaviors in a young adult population. METHODOLOGY: Two questionnaires were developed, one for adults (18+) and the other for young adults (11-17); both included demographic information, skin color, Fitzpatrick skin type, and history of sunburn as well as questions on knowledge, attitudes and practices related to sun exposure. The content was then piloted and its validity analyzed. The subsequent validation study was divided into 2 phases as follows: 1) analysis of the validity and internal consistency of the items in a cross-sectional study of 1,482 adults and adolescents, using exploratory factor analysis to test construct validity and Cronbach α to measure internal consistency; and 2) evaluation of test-retest reliability in 39 individuals. RESULTS: The pilot study demonstrated the content validity of both questionnaires. Principal component analysis revealed that 2 components in each of the dimensions studied accounted for over 50% of the variance. A good correlation was found between the items studied. Validity was demonstrated in the first phase of the analysis with a Cronbach α of between 0.45 and 0.8 for all components except knowledge (0.335). In the second phase, test-retest reliability was demonstrated (absolute agreement>60%). CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties of the questionnaire make it a valid and reliable tool for the study of knowledge, attitudes, and habits with respect to sun exposure in the young adult school population.

Sensibilización de contacto a alérgenos de la serie estándar en el Hospital Costa del Sol: Estudio retrospectivo (2005-2010) / Contact Sensitization to Allergens in the Spanish Standard Series at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain: a Retrospective Study (2005-2010)

La prevalencia de la alergia de contacto a los diferentes compuestos puede variar dependiendo de la población estudiada, de la técnica y del material empleado en las pruebas epicutáneas. En España el Grupo Español de Investigación en Dermatitis de Contacto y Alergia Cutánea (GEIDAC) ha propuesto una batería de 29 alérgenos para estudiar a los pacientes con sospecha de dermatitis de contacto alérgica. Material y métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de 839 pacientes con sospecha de dermatitis de contacto, realizado en el Hospital Costa del Sol desde el 1 de enero de 2005 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2010. Para ello se utilizaron pruebas epicutáneas estándar de 34 alérgenos en las que estuvieron incluidos los 29 compuestos de la batería estándar española propuesta por el GEIDAC. Objetivo: Valorar la prevalencia de la sensibilización de contacto entre los pacientes estudiados y estudiar su asociación con factores sociodemográficos (sexo, edad, localización, ocupación) y clínicos (dermatitis atópica). Resultados: El 48% de los pacientes presentó sensibilización al menos a uno de los alérgenos testados. Las mujeres presentaron una frecuencia de sensibilización más elevada que los hombres (56,9 vs. 33,1%). La localización afectada con mayor frecuencia fue la mano (36,1%). Los alérgenos más frecuentes fueron sulfato de níquel (25,9%), dicromato potásico (7,6%), tiomersal (5,1%), cloruro de cobalto (4,5%) y mezcla de fragancias I (3,8%). Por el contrario, se detectó una baja frecuencia de sensibilización a conservantes como mezcla de parabenos (0,1%), imidazolidinil urea (0,1%), diazolidinil urea (0,2%) y mezcla de quinoleínas (0,2%). No se registraron sensibilizaciones para lactonas sesquiterpénicas y metildibromoglutaronitrilo (euxyl K400). Conclusiones: Nuestros resultados son similares a los previamente publicados a nivel nacional. La baja sensibilización a ciertos alérgenos, como la mayoría de conservantes y las lactonas sesquiterpénicas, podría hacer necesario reconsiderar su utilidad como alérgenos en futuras series estándar (AU)

Background: The prevalence of contact allergy to different compounds can vary according to the population studied, the technique used, and the materials employed in patch tests. The Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group (GEIDAC) has proposed a panel of 29 allergens for use in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Objective: To determine the prevalence of contact sensitization in a group of Spanish patients and to analyze potential associations with sociodemographic and clinical variables (sex, age, site of lesions, occupation, and diagnosis of atopic dermatitis). Material and methods: A retrospective study of patients with suspected contact dermatitis was undertaken at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain, for the period between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010; 839 patients were included in the analysis. Patch tests were carried out with 34 allergens, including the 29 compounds that comprise the Spanish standard panel proposed by the GEIDAC. Results: Sensitization to at least 1 allergen in the panel was observed in 48% of patients. Women had a higher frequency of sensitization than men (56.9% vs 33.1%). The hands were the most commonly affected site (36.1%). The most frequently involved allergens were nickel sulfate (25.9%), potassium dichromate (7.6%), thiomersal (5.1%), cobalt chloride (4.5%), and fragrance mix I (3.8%). In contrast, preservatives such as paraben mix (0.1%), imidazolidinyl urea (0.1%), diazolidinyl urea (0.2%), and quinoline mix (0.2%) had low rates of sensitization. Sensitization to sesquiterpene lactones and methyldibromo glutaronitrile (euxyl K 400) were not observed. Conclusions: Our results are similar to those previously reported for Spanish patients. The low level of sensitization to certain allergens such as most preservatives and sesquiterpene lactones may suggest that their use in standard patch test series should be reconsidered(AU)

[Contact sensitization to allergens in the Spanish standard series at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain: a retrospective study (2005-2010)]. / Sensibilización de contacto a alérgenos de la serie estándar en el Hospital Costa del Sol: Estudio retrospectivo (2005-2010).

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of contact allergy to different compounds can vary according to the population studied, the technique used, and the materials employed in patch tests. The Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group (GEIDAC) has proposed a panel of 29 allergens for use in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of contact sensitization in a group of Spanish patients and to analyze potential associations with sociodemographic and clinical variables (sex, age, site of lesions, occupation, and diagnosis of atopic dermatitis). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with suspected contact dermatitis was undertaken at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain, for the period between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010; 839 patients were included in the analysis. Patch tests were carried out with 34 allergens, including the 29 compounds that comprise the Spanish standard panel proposed by the GEIDAC. RESULTS: Sensitization to at least 1 allergen in the panel was observed in 48% of patients. Women had a higher frequency of sensitization than men (56.9% vs 33.1%). The hands were the most commonly affected site (36.1%). The most frequently involved allergens were nickel sulfate (25.9%), potassium dichromate (7.6%), thiomersal (5.1%), cobalt chloride (4.5%), and fragrance mix I (3.8%). In contrast, preservatives such as paraben mix (0.1%), imidazolidinyl urea (0.1%), diazolidinyl urea (0.2%), and quinoline mix (0.2%) had low rates of sensitization. Sensitization to sesquiterpene lactones and methyldibromo glutaronitrile (euxyl K 400) were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are similar to those previously reported for Spanish patients. The low level of sensitization to certain allergens such as most preservatives and sesquiterpene lactones may suggest that their use in standard patch test series should be reconsidered.